I’ve been meaning to write a post on the impact poor quality strength training equipment can have on your results for some time. An experience last week brought it to the forefront of my mind.
The incident involved a client of mine who’d been doing well with his training / rehab from a running injury. He had however noticed a secondary issue on increasing his mileage. Namely a tender hamstring.
He was following a programme I had set him in a well known gym / medical facility here in London. I could tell from his lack of progress on this issue that something wasn’t right. I offered to join him at his gym to go through some key exercises.
Within 5 minutes of entering the facility it was clear what the problem was. The equipment.
It astounds me that premium gyms, particularly those with medical facilities, spend vast amounts of money on everything but the quality of their equipment.
Equally astonishing is that some manufacturers seem to have little comprehension of either biomechanics or muscular system function. It’s rather like a car manufacturer making a car that neither stops or goes around corners.
The particular piece of equipment in this case was a seated leg curl.
Simple muscle mechanics.
Every muscle in the human body has a position where it is stronger and weaker. This is due to both mechanics and neurological input. The strength curve of a muscle typically follows a bell shaped curve.
It is weaker at either end of its operating range and stronger in the middle. Arthur Jones of Nautilus fame was the first person to build strength training machines to reflect this. That was in the 1970s.
Almost 50 years later it appears that some machine manufacturers haven’t woken up to this fact.
In some cases this makes the machines they build unusable.
Sitting my client on the seated leg curl and asking him to perform a few repetitions, I noticed he was using about half of the available range on the machine. He couldn’t get his legs past around 70 degrees of knee flexion.
When I jumped on the machine I could see why. If you set the resistance on the machine to be a challenge in the knee extended position, it was impossible to complete a full repetition.
Conversely, if you chose a resistance that you could complete the full repetition with, there was virtually no challenge in the starting position.
In order to provide a challenge to the knee flexors throughout their range, you would have to use the machine in two parts. One set in the shortened half of the range, the other in the lengthened half.
I recommended my client do precisely this. He however chose to cancel his membership. This is logical, you’d probably return a car that you couldn’t drive after all.
Here’s the thing though, who looks at the quality of the machines when joining a gym? And how many people know their results will suffer as a consequence of using inferior equipment?
Very few, which is probably why health clubs feel they can cut costs in this area.
How to test the machines in your gym.
Use this simple test to see whether the machines in your gym are offering you the challenge they should.
Set up either a leg extension or leg curl machine so your knee is level with the axis of the machine. This should be clearly marked either to the right or left of your knees.
Have the pad about half way up your lower leg and select the resistance you would normally use.
Firstly, can you complete a full repetition? In other words can you get from one end of the movement all the way to the other?
If you can does the challenge feel equal throughout the range?
If you can’t how much do you need to reduce the weight by in order to achieve this?
If you need to alter the weight by a significant amount, then the machines are probably not designed with your biomechanics in mind. Either think about splitting the exercise into two parts, or look for an alternative gym.
I recommend all of my clients seek out either Cybex or Technogym resistance training equipment as a minimum. These manufactures are two of the few that routinely consider biomechanics in the design of their equipment.